• advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • Announcements

    • odyd

      New subscription rates   04/06/2016

      Join us for Free; You can post on most of the threads, For those wanting to discuss Chinese solar and share trading details, we have   New membership rates $7 CAD per month and $60 CAD per year available at the store https://solarpvinvestor.com/store/
odyd

TerraForm Power, Inc. (TERP)

    691 posts in this topic

    I looked at the court  calendar for the court of Chancery:

    http://courts.delaware.gov/calendars/download.aspx?ID=46028

    Today was a hearing.  There are no opinions or orders from case # CA#11898-CB.

    This is the case. Appaloosa v Sune.

    You can check to see what has come of the case at:

    http://courts.delaware.gov/opinions/List.aspx?ag=Court+of+Chancery

    I wonder if this was a preliminary hearing to get immediate injunctive relief while the case is further looked over. 

    There is nothing further on the docket this week for Appaloosa v Sune.

    Not really happy with the action today.

    Best to all

     

    0

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    SCTY, VSLR went down big time, next was SUNE and TERP and GLBL.  The one reason why Tepper is suing is not to get into residential solar, it seems that chaos created in Nevada, now state utility being sued by 15K customer coalition shows the weakness of the segment.

    TERP does not have any residential solar, the fight is on, still the market like a bubbly idiot, is selling all three stocks. Then you got 8P3 selling when FSLR gets 500MW job.

    What a disconnection, with oil measuring yieldco. How one argues validity of the thesis here?

    I am wondering about Tepper wanting compensation for the deal, but clearly if he gets it, everyone is entitled, laws apply equally. So I think this is not realistic. There could be other concessions offered as seat on the BOD or maybe management position for someone trusted by him. I think his actions to prevent us from having residential solar got their proof of value today. Too bad that nothing firm came out from the hearing.

    On Dec 1 when first letter became public 32M shares traded and stock went up from 6.90 to 9.15,

    We are living in the price ranges induced by softness in other places on the map, I am not happy but every stock in the space hurts.

    1

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Thanks Odyd. Can't understand anything. Not sure what GLBL has to do with any of this.

    0

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Saush, I doubt there is anything to be understood.  I get the part about Nevada, it makes everyone think about other states etc and growth of rooftop solar, however TERP is not that company, nor GLBL.

    Dummies from SUNE had it made and they needed to deal in Vivint, residential solar, struggle every quarter from SolarCity trying to glue a story of great future with massive losses. Now what, falling apart going against logic, shareholders, analysts, everyone has given up on Vivint as value, yet they still want it.

    People who are seen as irrational cause problems for everyone. This is why GLBL and TERP are suffering. If TERP is not excluded from Vivint transaction and judge does not stop it, then TERP will survive, but I doubt SUNE will. I think we will be for a lot of turmoil.

    1

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    I agree with other potential concessions for Tepper.

    Will this turn into a full trial or will we hear something in the next day or two?

     

    0

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    The trial situation is involving a transaction, which is about to complete. The order needs to be given to enjoin the transaction, otherwise they will proceed with it. There was a date of Jan 29th at one point, but I doubt this applies any more to consummate.

    If SUNE closes it, the only thing left is a matter of arguing compensation. I guess that clause may put fear of God into SUNE not to rush into it. Still, who knows who thinks they are powerful enough to act as nothing matters. SUNE against all, could just go fort it looking for money from Blackstone, who does not want anything to do with Vivint.

     

    0

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    20 hours ago, odyd said:

    Here's how David Tepper's lawsuit could really screw up Wall Street's nightmare stock

    http://finance.yahoo.com/news/heres-david-teppers-lawsuit-could-202309690.html

    1

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    According to the article:

    "As the Vivint deal stands now, when it's done TerraForm Power will have to buy $922 million worth of Vivint assets, in what's called a take-or-pay agreement, and take on $960 million of its debt.

    Tepper, who has a stake in TerraForm Power but not SunEdison, is trying to get an injunction to stop this portion of the deal."

    How did TERP get into this "take-or-pay" agreement in the first place?  Was it forced onto them from SUNE?

    I really hope Tepper can get this injunction.  It would be great for TERP.  The stock will skyrocket (maybe a double from here).  But we have to wait until Feb 16.  Well, that is only a hearing.  Maybe SUNE can drop the deal before then.  That would be great.

    0

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    By Feb 16th some sort of arrangement should be made I would think.  SUNE sinking and bad ruling would lead to their demise.

    why hasn't SUNE figured this out yet?

    Unless SUNE wants to go down swinging.

    0

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    3 hours ago, Jetmoney said:

    According to the article:

    "As the Vivint deal stands now, when it's done TerraForm Power will have to buy $922 million worth of Vivint assets, in what's called a take-or-pay agreement, and take on $960 million of its debt.

    Tepper, who has a stake in TerraForm Power but not SunEdison, is trying to get an injunction to stop this portion of the deal."

    How did TERP get into this "take-or-pay" agreement in the first place?  Was it forced onto them from SUNE?

    I really hope Tepper can get this injunction.  It would be great for TERP.  The stock will skyrocket (maybe a double from here).  But we have to wait until Feb 16.  Well, that is only a hearing.  Maybe SUNE can drop the deal before then.  That would be great.

    The number is not accurate I think it is $799M, and TERP agreed to take them even if they did not have financing. I am not sure that article is that accurate in this matter.

    0

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    2 hours ago, zendoc1love said:

    By Feb 16th some sort of arrangement should be made I would think.  SUNE sinking and bad ruling would lead to their demise.

    why hasn't SUNE figured this out yet?

    Unless SUNE wants to go down swinging.

    If TERP was off the transaction SUNE would end. Still do not know why SUNE insist to end itself.

    0

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    the article also got the VSLR buyout price wrong.  The offer was for ~2.2B, which was later reduced by ~$300M to ~$1.9B.

    Somehow I don't think that was their top reporter on that piece...

    0

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Interesting that BoA is serving as administrative and collateral agent to transaction between TERP and Vivint assets. Wonder if they downgraded the stock to pressure Tepper holdings.... Sounds crazy but I am not surprised.

    0

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Reading the TERP agreement this is part of it

    "CONDITIONS PRECEDENT

    Section 7.01 Conditions to the Obligations of Each Party. The respective obligation of each party to consummate and cause the consummation of the transactions contemplated herein are subject to the satisfaction or waiver by Seller and Purchaser on or prior to the Closing of the following conditions:

    (a) No Injunctions or Restraints. No (i) temporary restraining order or preliminary or permanent injunction or other order, in each case, by any court of competent jurisdiction preventing, prohibiting, restraining, enjoining or rendering illegal the consummation of the Merger shall have been issued and be continuing in effect or (ii) applicable law of a Governmental Authority of competent jurisdiction shall be in in effect prohibiting or rendering illegal the consummation of the Merger or the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement."

    Does this means in case of injunction, TERP can sign a waiver and allow to consummate the transaction?

    0

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Corporate shuffle. Francisco "Pancho" Perez Gundin, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of TerraForm Power is gone from Terra and SunEdison, people talked a lot about him.

    0

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    there is Bloomberg note on it. Wonder why? This was day after the Tepper filing, he could be named in the lawsuit.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-01-21/sunedison-operating-chief-gundin-departs-effective-immediately?cmpid=yhoo.headline

    0

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    59 minutes ago, odyd said:

    Corporate shuffle. Francisco "Pancho" Perez Gundin, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of TerraForm Power is gone from Terra and SunEdison, people talked a lot about him.

    Odyd,

    Is this the reason for a change in the color today for GLBL and TERP? Or is it just the market?

    Thanks

    0

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    1 hour ago, odyd said:

    Corporate shuffle. Francisco "Pancho" Perez Gundin, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of TerraForm Power is gone from Terra and SunEdison, people talked a lot about him.

    Sorry, but I'm out of the loop on Gundin.  What were people saying?  Was he perceived to be a part of making the Vivint deal happen?  So his leaving is a sign the deal might be off?

    0

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Just saw that JKS signed a 1GW U.S. supply deal.  I can't figure out how to post links as cutting and pasting no longer works. 

    0

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites

     I don't think his leaving is the reason for the price share increase today. We were due for the day. If you look at it, however, there is not much volume so not much conviction at this point. When we get something definitive from this injunction the volume will be huge.  

    His leaving is a good sign, imo that Tepper is catalyzing some changes.  

    SUNE is horrible lately about informing investors.  

    0

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    Just saw that JKS signed a 1GW U.S. supply deal.  I can't figure out how to post links as cutting and pasting no longer works. 

    It works fine, not sure what you mean, but this is not the thread to post jks.

    0

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    I am confused about the COO leaving TERP. Some reports say he was the one protesting board changes that SUNE was trying to make. If he is being forced out, doesnt that mean SUNE is getting the upper hand? = not good news for TERP? 

    maybe better news for SUNE?

    0

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    It is SUNE's COO that is the one leaving--but he did resign from TERPs board in Nov.

    Possibly good news for SUNE, but could also be viewed as the rats abandoning the ship...

    0

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    All the more reason. If as a SUNE insider he is being forced out, that means SUNE CEO et al are getting more control over TERP/GLBL. Why would the market take this as a positive for any of these companies?

    0

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    It is SUNE's COO that is the one leaving--but he did resign from TERPs board in Nov.

    Possibly good news for SUNE, but could also be viewed as the rats abandoning the ship...

    He functioned in TERP as well, hence both companies released sec filling.

    0

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.


    Sign In Now

    • Recently Browsing   0 members

      No registered users viewing this page.