odyd

8point3 Energy Partners LP (CAFD)

60 posts in this topic

58 minutes ago, explo said:

Maybe SPWR is too troubled to add sponsor value to CAFD? Would it help CAFD to achieve lower yield if FSLR buy out SPWR?

 

Interesting conclusion. I am not sure if FSLR is interested in CAFD that much as an investment, but what we know, both are interested in selling to it.

I have a concern about the pricing mechanisms for future projects. 

If both companies are looking for cash flows, granted, SPWR is looking like it needs it more, CAFD could appear vulnerable.  The shuffling of the projects was simply an announcement, in my view showing that CAFD is the instrument only to be played as needed.

I am not saying that intentions are to abuse CAFD by sponsors, it is more of perception, showing the company is not controlling the future. Perceptions are the alternative facts of the stock market. 

I think that growth and acquisitions are the likely statements to support yieldcos on the market. The combination of those with dividend growth should influence the sentiment. Despite dividend growth, NEP was disliked in last hour. My doubts here are the financial vehicle appearance of NEP among business of NEE' companies. Change in IDR is positive but it simply happens.It is "on-paper" company, good one, but still.

CAFD confirmed solar industry is struggling, and we already know that both its sponsors are going to struggle the most. Without the financial strength to expand, questions being raised about the value of international pipelines, repetitive highlighting of the US projects over any other ones, it put pressure on the trio.

Rightfully so yieldcos are measured by the strength of own sponsors, CAFD is experiencing what the other two feel or the market made that clear.

 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I read the cc now, the borrowing structure for CAFD has non-amortizing debt which is all due in mid of 2020, some $732M. Not having interest rate locked, mind you 45% of it is hedged, can be seen also as a weakness in a current environment. Getting to a corporate debt, perhaps as a small snug as the company does not have investment grade rating. This could, as it had affected PEGI, cost them.

Finally not paying down principle now, and doing so in the future, could be seen as the impact on distributions.  When you think of principle payment on $732M in 20 years that is more than they are paying in dividend now, I guess CAFD looks a lot less attractive to me than before.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, odyd said:

I read the cc now, the borrowing structure for CAFD has non-amortizing debt which is all due in mid of 2020, some $732M. Not having interest rate locked, mind you 45% of it is hedged, can be seen also as a weakness in a current environment. Getting to a corporate debt, perhaps as a small snug as the company does not have investment grade rating. This could, as it had affected PEGI, cost them.

Finally not paying down principle now, and doing so in the future, could be seen as the impact on distributions.  When you think of principle payment on $732M in 20 years that is more than they are paying in dividend now, I guess CAFD looks a lot less attractive to me than before.

What do they do with the CAFD? The Class A dividend  is only a small portion of the total. Do they give the rest to the Parent or do they keep it for running the business?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, SCSolar said:

What do they do with the CAFD? The Class A dividend  is only a small portion of the total. Do they give the rest to the Parent or do they keep it for running the business?

CAFD is the non-GAAP representation of potential payout. It is calculated differently by each yieldco, or almost differently unfortunately to us mortals. CAFD is not a pool of money in an account. it is a statement of different results pooled to show availability of liquidity. All accounts and statements are of yieldco. Nothing is given to parents unless it is in a form of payments or IDRs.

CAFD calls it "Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) to Adjusted EBITDA and Cash Available for Distribution (CAFD)"

PEGI does it as "non-GAAP net cash provided by operating activities to cash available for distribution and net loss to adjusted EBITDA".

Payment of a dividend is considered a financing activity. One made to A shareholders was $20M, Sponsors got $12M, CAFD was about $73M, os 32/73=43% payout. not bad. But as mention, no principle payments are made. 

PEGI pays 88% of CAFD, but if I put their principle payments back,, hey are about 62%. 

 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, odyd said:

 

CAFD calls it "Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) to Adjusted EBITDA and Cash Available for Distribution (CAFD)"

Payment of a dividend is considered a financing activity. One made to A shareholders was $20M, Sponsors got $12M, CAFD was about $73M, os 32/73=43% payout. not bad. But as mention, no principle payments are made. 

 

 

I am trying to wrap my hands around CAFD.

Do you know what percentage of the CAFD is distributed to the tax equity partners(TEP) of the projects?  The TEP get monthly and quarterly distributions that is distributed by the Sponsors operating the OpCo.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, SCSolar said:

I am trying to wrap my hands around CAFD.

Do you know what percentage of the CAFD is distributed to the tax equity partners(TEP) of the projects?  The TEP get monthly and quarterly distributions that is distributed by the Sponsors operating the OpCo.

There is a line for tax equity on financing activity netting about $3M

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like CAFD filed to sell $125M of shares ,

Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/27/2017 at 11:00 AM, disdaniel said:

investors must assume a share issue is in the works. 

Hope no one is surprised...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, disdaniel said:

Hope no one is surprised...

Good call Daniel

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.