You are not logged in.

Klothilde

Professional

  • "Klothilde" started this thread

Posts: 540

Date of registration: Nov 19th 2012

Thanks: 62

  • Send private message

1

Tuesday, April 16th 2013, 3:49am

LDK Solar defaults on US$23.7 million bond

http://www.pv-tech.org/news/ldk_solar_de…n=news-rss-feed

http://investor.ldksolar.com/phoenix.zht…7016&highlight=

WTH??? These guys don't even have pocket change to pay western bondholders 24 lousy millions???

This is a big blow to the whole sector. Imho it shows China is not serious about protecting the interests of western share- and bondholders.

This post has been edited 1 times, last edit by "Klothilde" (Apr 16th 2013, 3:54am)


eysteinh

Intermediate

Posts: 248

Date of registration: Dec 9th 2012

Thanks: 27

  • Send private message

2

Tuesday, April 16th 2013, 4:20am

I wrote about suntech and LDK in danger of falling over a year ago on the norwegian forum hegnar online. I would also point out to the exellent article here on pvsolarinvestor:
https://solarpvinvestor.com/spvi-news/474…comes-desperate

explo

Professional

Posts: 917

Date of registration: Sep 29th 2012

Thanks: 86

  • Send private message

3

Tuesday, April 16th 2013, 4:28am

It's already been known for a long while that LDK bond and share holders are screwed. With LDK much deeper under water than STP, nothing else is to be expected.

explo

Professional

Posts: 917

Date of registration: Sep 29th 2012

Thanks: 86

  • Send private message

4

Tuesday, April 16th 2013, 4:30am

April 18 will should shake those with no clue, but I think the market has accounted for this. Reverse on news.

eysteinh

Intermediate

Posts: 248

Date of registration: Dec 9th 2012

Thanks: 27

  • Send private message

5

Tuesday, April 16th 2013, 4:45am

It's already been known for a long while that LDK bond and share holders are screwed. With LDK much deeper under water than STP, nothing else is to be expected.


This is true. One carefull look at the balance sheet and you would have known.

solarcat

Unregistered

6

Tuesday, April 16th 2013, 6:21am

Sorry explo but the street shows it is clueless when it trades LDK at $142mil market cap as of the close yesterday. That's nearly 40% more valuation than JKS and SOL and nearly as much as JASO and CSIQ. The street is clueless all around. LDK and STP should have been trading at 10c months ago IMO.

The street has not shown intelligence when it comes to differentiate among Chi solars, even when a large body of evidence shows them the path.

This post has been edited 1 times, last edit by "solarcat" (Apr 16th 2013, 6:56am)


explo

Professional

Posts: 917

Date of registration: Sep 29th 2012

Thanks: 86

  • Send private message

7

Tuesday, April 16th 2013, 6:45am

I don't mean market cap of LDK and STP. Those make no sense since those companies have drowned already. I mean when the street pull down all solar 11s, even those with healthy balance sheet and business conditions, in anticipation of the sentiment effect the illness headlines LDK will post shortly will have on its healthy peers for the clueless mass.

They've all be taken down (like SOL from 2.85 to 2.15, chased to 2.35 on blow out report and then beaten to a pulp down to 1.25) on no new development. We knew STP and LDK would blow up and EU would register modules. And liked it. So I think WS is playing a sentiment game with the clueless part of the market that will capitulate on the lows on the "no news" while the WS accumulates its target amounts and then release them.

The status is still the same. 2011 was the decline year, 2012 was the trough year, and a major one, 2013 will be the recovery year, with margins turning positive in second half for those with lowest cost structures. 2014 might be boom and shortage with bloated margins and major balance sheet repair. Now is the time to accumulate all who will not drown coming 2 months. SolarWorld, STP and LDK gave the street the perfect excuse to achieve a super low accumulation point before the party.

Boss

Intermediate

Posts: 147

Date of registration: Jan 15th 2013

Thanks: 18

  • Send private message

8

Tuesday, April 16th 2013, 6:54am

That LDK is bankrupt is really nothing new. Everyone (except LDK shareholder) knew that for at least 1 year. It is about time that LDK goes bankrupt. IMO

Klothilde

Professional

  • "Klothilde" started this thread

Posts: 540

Date of registration: Nov 19th 2012

Thanks: 62

  • Send private message

9

Tuesday, April 16th 2013, 7:46am

Oh Baby Jesus all Chi Solars except CSUN are actually UP despite the LDK news. Explo might be right, the market may already know the difference between LDK, CSUN and peers.

solarcat

Unregistered

10

Tuesday, April 16th 2013, 7:54am

Yeah right... the market sure knows the difference... LDK up 13% since the open... LOL

chrisceeaustin

Trainee

Posts: 57

Date of registration: Mar 23rd 2013

Thanks: 3

  • Send private message

11

Tuesday, April 16th 2013, 8:10am

Shouldn't LDK bankruptcy benefit both SOL and WFR? Is that not common sense? Or am I missing something? And should not GTAT take a bit of a hit as it may lose a customer, along with other Chinese customers from the new restrictions on lending?

odyd12

Administrator

Posts: 1,247

Date of registration: Jan 3rd 2013

Thanks: 152

  • Send private message

12

Tuesday, April 16th 2013, 9:12am

The bond was $23M and they made arrangements for 17M. Sounds to me those who were defaulted on did not like the arrangements. To go to such a bad press for $6M, while three months ago company had about $111M in cash, is pretty brutal.
The fact that STP is moving up on it is just confirmation how surreal the solar stock market is, if even such a thing exists.
How is Suntech Holdings which is a shell of the company without its subsidiaries in China, still trading and not making statements around its solvency?.

Based on Yingli's CFO, foreign debt is the one they have worried about the most so, if those are paid off or default on, this will be the difference between what happens in China. Now they are saying 80% of industry in China is closed and
domestic debt will be turned without issue, until they can get profits again. Not the most ethical way to work this, but who cares at the end. They have been left for dead by the global markets, so naturally they should get supported at home.

redsolar

Trainee

Posts: 115

Date of registration: Sep 30th 2012

Thanks: 7

  • Send private message

13

Tuesday, April 16th 2013, 9:28am

What is Unethical here is...
Total disregard to the foreign investor..and running them like Govt. Employment centers. These should not even be allowed to be listed on global markets.

Klothilde

Professional

  • "Klothilde" started this thread

Posts: 540

Date of registration: Nov 19th 2012

Thanks: 62

  • Send private message

14

Tuesday, April 16th 2013, 9:31am

Go to the GTM commentary about the STP insolvency. In the end the thing basically was a transfer of ownership from foreign investors to Chinese stakeholders. Sharholders and bondholders got flushed down the toilet and assets went to banks and local government, ensuring continuity in operations and jobs. Seems they'll replicated this model with LDK.

odyd12

Administrator

Posts: 1,247

Date of registration: Jan 3rd 2013

Thanks: 152

  • Send private message

15

Tuesday, April 16th 2013, 9:46am

well, we will still have to see what the final outcome is . Wuxi Guolian was appointed to look after the assets by the court.
Assets are in China owed by Chinese subsidiary of Suntech holdings. I am sure you know there is GSF and the Japan's business which has nothing to do with Wuxi moves.
My opinion is that Suntech Holdings will remain as owner of those entities (not located in Mainland). The only plant which is running today is already owned by 40% Wuxi SOEs. This will be kept by the state. Rest will be sold to give something back to banks.
This is the only way I can explain why Suntech Holdings is simply trading. The GSF maybe the only value they have and one to be sold to pay that convertible bond. I am sure details will be known.
The story with LDK is similar, I agree.
Every bankruptcy destroys shareholders, and perhaps saves few cents on the dollar to bondholders.

solarcat

Unregistered

16

Tuesday, April 16th 2013, 9:50am

Klothilde, I agree with what you wrote. Then why STP is still trading and up 15% at that? Who are those 4 million stock holders? All chinese? I very much doubt it.

so-so-solar

Beginner

Posts: 2

Date of registration: Apr 12th 2013

  • Send private message

17

Tuesday, April 16th 2013, 10:26am

Actually many chinese solar forums mentioned about the LDK's status and critically stated LDF with high default risk. In a short run, SunTech model should apply to LDK. What different is SunTech itself was a company with good operating model. It was just a few wrong decision done owner causing the default inevitable. However, LDK is very different because LDK is extremely inefficient and possess poor operating model. It was superbly back up by a chinese province in such a way that govt had guaranteed a huge amount of debts. In turn the debt grew too big to be sustained and yet good operating business was to build up to sustain the continuity of business.

LDK does not only a refinance of its debt and also need a super restructure of the company so as to keep the going concern.

explo

Professional

Posts: 917

Date of registration: Sep 29th 2012

Thanks: 86

  • Send private message

18

Tuesday, April 16th 2013, 10:43am

Like odyd says in case of BK the share holders are last in line, so when bond holders don't get paid how can people pay this much for STP and LDK shares when they are likely not worth anything?

solarfun

Beginner

Posts: 29

Date of registration: Oct 10th 2012

  • Send private message

19

Tuesday, April 16th 2013, 1:12pm

We don't know who is buying these shares, it could be somebody collecting shares for a takeover bid. Plus it could be just gambling, if you believe that the Chinese government will bail them out eventually.

explo

Professional

Posts: 917

Date of registration: Sep 29th 2012

Thanks: 86

  • Send private message

20

Tuesday, April 16th 2013, 1:16pm

Any bail out will be for the benefit of the company's China operations, not for U.S. shareholders.

Similar threads

Social bookmarks

New Member

igaruz(Apr 19th 2013, 7:35am)

solarking(Apr 18th 2013, 3:41am)

grkberry(Apr 17th 2013, 7:47pm)

Antaisolar(Apr 13th 2013, 7:13pm)

Zuid(Apr 13th 2013, 11:25am)

Statistic

  • Members: 80
  • Threads: 1,042
  • Postings: 6,945 (ø 33.39/day)
  • Greetings to our newest member: igaruz

.