Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'CSIQ'.

More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


  • Investing Forums
    • Solar Cos
    • Yieldcos
    • Investor Discussions
    • ETFs
    • REITs


  • Community Calendar


  • Solar PV Investor - Robert Dydo Analysis


  • Articles

Found 4 results

  1. CSIQ Q2 2016

    CSIQ Q2 results
  2. Investing in solar manufacturing stocks have been a big disappointment this year. In particular, the perception shapes up more and more like a disaster, because of China putting a sharp stop on demand. Since the majority of manufacturing is in China, a glut of material is pushing fear into investors to avoid a repeat of 2011/2012 great glut, which bankrupted many companies and weakened the survivors greatly. Fortunately, every risk resulting in fear offers an opportunity for profit and what followed great glut was a year of massive appreciation of values. 2013 was one of the best years for record gains, in fact, Canadian Solar Inc. (NASDAQ:CSIQ) was the greatest gain for NASDAQ exchange for that very year. While the general view on solar as the industry is struggling with demand versus supply condition is poor, the final view of the impact for tier one companies trading on the US markets is still out, at least for me. Investors are awaiting reports for the second quarter to learn conclusively if the impact is in fact as severe as it appears to be for all other tiers. I hold a personal belief that tier one companies can maneuver the situation a lot better than its lower ranking competitors. Bankability is one of the reasons, and that is experience learned in the great glut of 2011/2012. Top companies today were top companies then. They were losing money on margin, but they were not in a condition to become bankrupt by it. I think that severity of margin losses is going to be milder than in the great glut but will impact earnings nevertheless. Power generation will help those financial statements with revenue from electricity sales. Also in the case of Canadian Solar, plant sales, can and are expected to boost margin and cash flow. All the same, the market is reacting as the problem is on the horizon and the down adjustment on value is already in place. Canadian Solar trades at 50% down year to date. JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. (NYSE:JKS) at 33%, Trina Solar Limited (NYSE:TSL) at 29% and First Solar, Inc. (NASDAQ:FSLR) at 25% loss. SunPower Corporation (NASDAQ:SPWR) is actually 51% lower YTD. I believe we are looking at the market assumption on the impact of disappearing earnings. Both, SPWR and CSIQ, embody lower than other names gross margins hence they are suffering the most. I think that in the case of Canadian, the gross margin impact, at one point, would have been somewhat misread, since it was building greater efficiency in cell and would produce better margin, but natural tragedy in Funing, China destroyed 1GW of solar cell production. I think it is reasonable to fear impacts on gross margin, while Canadian may not lose the ability to produce the guided volume. By the end of the 2015 and in early 2016 I have tried to refocus my objectives on yieldcos as they have offered, renewable focus investment, the opportunity for gains in the value of equity and dividend. It was an alternative to peaks and valleys of solar manufacturing stocks. I have chosen what had appeared the most undervalued one. TerraForm Power Inc. (NASDAQ:TERP) seemed to me to have more value than TerraForm Global Inc. (NASDAQ:GLBL) both on equity value versus its producing assets and level of dividend. I have expected SunEdison (SUNEQ) to be bankrupt perhaps longer than anyone at least on Seeking Alpha. Despite the condition, I was not concerned about the yieldcos. Unfortunately, ongoing concern with listing status and SEC had made me sell TERP, as I could not justify holding to it under my principles. Months later, while the situation in this aspect has not changed and the dividend has not been paid for some nine months, there is a very good possibility for TERP to be owned by another entity and cure all the listing ills. I suspect that level of dividend will no longer be as potent when the dust settles, but certainly, the comeback will be a sign of full health returning to yieldcos. As a resolution to TERP dilemma, I have invested subsequently after in Pattern Energy Group Inc. (NASDAQ:PEGI) and Nextera Energy Partners LP(NYSE:NEP). I looked at the dividend levels and equity, both offering stability and seeing growth this year. PEGI has have done remarkably well in this aspect. I have got only a small benefit from those gains as I traded them prematurely into shares of the manufacturers what I thought were experiencing a new bottom. Both yieldco stocks continued to sail away adding value in the meantime, while manufacturers continue to falter. Trading in and out to repair the impacts of this mistake, I have recently made a decision to invest in Canadian equity of a renewable yieldco called TransAlta Renewables Inc (TSE:RNW). In my spectrum of yieldco interest, it was one among already mentioned PEGI, NEP and also NRG Yield, Inc. Class C (NYSE:NYLD). I think that yieldcos have crept up in value in the last couple of months, in particular as a reflection of the positive resolution to SUNEQ yieldcos. As a confirmation of it, yields on dividends, have normalized to the region of 4 to 6% and moreover against visionaries drawing from oil price impacts, they did not lower dividend levels. TransAlta, in my opinion, has still relative space to gain value in equity. The parent company is against the wall with a decision on some 4GW coal generation to be retired by 2030 in my home province of Alberta. I think for both, this leads to investment into renewables with higher expediency and in particular, in solar. TransAlta Renewables does not have a single MW in solar, while the parent has bought and most likely will transfer 21MW acquired in the US to it. As I mentioned, the interest in the projects and portfolio of SUNEQ yieldcos put a positive light on other yieldocs, which have been already saved from the volatility of solar manufacturers. I think this trend is to continue. Still, the risk to own for a new buyer, SUNEQ yieldcos are very attractive to commercial, institutional ownership giving other names an opportunity to serve as an alternative eliminating the risks. The profile of yieldcos appears to be an oasis of peace in the sea of volatility what future may hold for solar manufacturing. I think, in the current situation, what is happening in China and in addition to the US elections’ outcome which may put Donald Trump into the presidency, Chinese solar manufacturers have a particularly tough test to pass and certainly face heavy, down pressure. On the other hand, If Hilary Clinton is elected, with no exposure to China, FSLR and SPWR could be gaining a lot more attention, and along with it, appreciation. In this scenario, in my opinion, Chinese stocks would remain only modestly priced. To remain invested in yieldcos is part of my strategy for solar to sort itself during those events and to watch for the signs of the opportunity to appear. A lot less potential than 2013, the effective return of 100% is my objective this time, not a concern while drawing a regular dividend during the waiting period. The catalysts to watch start with the Q2 results with a focus on the Q3 2016 guidance and commentary for the year. First Solar reports this coming week to offer the first glimpse in Q3. Then we have SunPower on the 9th. For yieldcos, quarterly results do not have the same impacts, but two of them report on the 9th, NYLD, and RNW.TE. Chinese are yet to announce their calls, but any indication for Canadian Solar on plant sales this year and plans for 2017 would be interesting. The election results, as mentioned in above paragraph, are also very important, and this is a critical catalyst in my view. Lastly, global demand for solar is expected to growth every year, but currently, 2018 seem to model as the year of financial progress for solar manufacturers. The presence of indicators like improved gross margins, greater EPS, potential IPO for Canadian Solar’s yieldco using sympathetic market conditions, could become unique factors to trigger re-investment sooner. In the final thought, yieldcos seem to be independent of above concerns, and I consider them a perfect vehicle to sit out another shake-up in the solar industry.
  3. I have done a crude analysis of the 2015 revenue content for Canadian Solar (CSIQ), and these are the figures. Canadian is expected to get $3.397B in overall revenue with some $1.094B in revenue from the total solution. Canadian portfolio plant sales were around $360M. Some $441M is my assumption to be equity sold in the plants in the US. Rest, around $294M, was revenue from the EPC mainly and other sales classified as a total solution. Module sales were around 4.38GW at $2.3B an average of $0.53 per watt. So based on peeling the onion I was able to look into the future of 2016. Assuming that CSIQ would probably do 5.5GW in module sales in 2016 at $0.50 per watt, revenue from module sales would contribute around $2.7B. This is healthy growth of 25% The problem starts with the plant sale revenue and essentially with the source of it. Canadian has a pipeline of projects in Japan and Brazil, both seeing most development during 2017. Some strong outlining of the strategy will be required here as the market certainly will not welcome drop in the revenues what is seems to be a gap of some $700M. Japan’s plans are about 72MW to be developed in 2016 for the total ownership of 100MW or so. If the company decided to sell those projects, the revenue generation would be around $250M. I would expect acceleration here, after the second quarter of 2016, most of the projects in current US roster are finished. All of late US pipeline projects have been sold or have investment tax equity in it. There are Chinese plants, which probably are not considered for sale due to FiT concerns are not seeing much activity in the region or having any consideration to be a sellers’ market. It is hard to evaluate the situation in Brazil since plants in Brazil are being affected by the exchange rates. I still consider them as valuable to Canadian Solar. I am not sure however if they would have attractive gross margins currently if open to the market sales. Finally, there is a yieldco situation. Yieldco would probably require financial strength to transition 500MW of the US pipeline, 80MW of Canadian plants and about 50MW of UK plants, with the last set probably also better to be sold rather than kept. However, at 600MW, the IPO would have to bring somewhere around $200M in 2016 to pay for the equity portion of Canadian's Investment. At $15 per share, 20M share offering out of 40M shares outstanding could offer potentially $60 to $80M in CAFD to investors. The company valued $600M would have potential of $1.5 per share in dividend with yield of 10%, which would show more of distress situation on the market currently experienced by YieldCos Selling below $15 could affect the transfer value or the level of ownership. It may certainly not eliminate the control of the new yieldco, but it would seem immediate to sell equity for so low and so much of it of the hop. It will be critical to listen to clues and fully appreciate the March 10th call. At this point as I mentioned elsewhere, I am not holding a position in CSIQ to get clarity on above points
  4. Canadian Solar (CSIQ)

    Canadian Solar Inc. (the "Company" or "Canadian Solar") (NASDAQ: CSIQ), one of the world's largest solar companies, today announced the delivery 26 MW of its high quality and high-performing CS6P-P solar power modules to EPC Contractor TSK Solar for the "San Fermin" solar power plant installation in Puerto Rico, co-developed by firms Uriel Renewables inc. and Coqui Power LLC. The solar power plant is located in the North Eastern town of Loiza, a region that regularly faces adverse weather conditions such as hurricanes, tropical storms and flooding. Due to the specific nature of the project and its location, the project's electrical equipment were installed on structures that elevated them two to four meters above ground, and have also been designed to withstand winds of up to 260 kilometers per hour. http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=196781&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=1740448&highlight=