You are not logged in.

MichaelZhao

Trainee

  • "MichaelZhao" started this thread

Posts: 78

Date of registration: Feb 5th 2013

Thanks: 8

  • Send private message

1

Thursday, April 25th 2013, 12:55pm

CSIQ vs SOL

CSIQ was my #1 pick due to the clear path (project business) to profitability in Q2, plus their all-in module manufacturing cost at 0.55 by the end of 2012, on the way to 0.50~0.53 by the end of 2013.

But the recent leaked new for SOL ( http://www.solarzoom.com/article-28054-1.html ) Q1 earning surprised me.

Looks like SOL already turn into profitable in Q1 (not a lot, but at least stopped bleeding) !?

In this article, it also mentioned that they are making 10% more on outsourcing deals (cost up 10%, but ASP up 20%). To me this is a "clear path" to profitability.

So, now I am toward SOL as my #1 pick, what's your thought guys?

1 registered user thanked already.

Users who thanked for this post:

yiandrewli

explo

Professional

Posts: 1,057

Date of registration: Sep 29th 2012

Thanks: 94

  • Send private message

2

Thursday, April 25th 2013, 1:17pm

Josh is usually good at assessing these articles in Chinese. Is it one guy's speculation or does he have a source that leaked the bottom line? Anyway for them to reach profit in Q1 I think they would need help from some non-operating items, like reversing the tax provision in Q4 or CB gains or similar.

odyd12

Administrator

Posts: 1,426

Date of registration: Jan 3rd 2013

Thanks: 187

  • Send private message

3

Thursday, April 25th 2013, 1:52pm

I am really curious what Pop got for response on this article. Another very good question is where is that 20% ASP increase coming from? SOL sold modules on average at 0.63, so are we saying they sold outsourced modules at $0.75 in Q1?

I am very cautious about this article. I read some articles in the past, which stated similar claims like one about LDK recently claiming billions of dollars in revenue, profit etc. during general assembly of shareholders in China.

I advise caution, without prejudice

.

Boss

Intermediate

Posts: 174

Date of registration: Jan 15th 2013

Thanks: 18

  • Send private message

4

Thursday, April 25th 2013, 2:00pm

I do not think the article is true!!! Just based on SOL last CC. The numbers do not match!!!

Klothilde

Professional

Posts: 638

Date of registration: Nov 19th 2012

Thanks: 73

  • Send private message

5

Thursday, April 25th 2013, 2:13pm

Let' assume innocence until proven guilty.

Congrats SOL on being profitable despite idled poly plant and massive outsourcing !

Proves demand for SOL products is going through the roof despite 20% ASP hike !!!!

yiandrewli

Beginner

Posts: 3

Date of registration: Apr 7th 2013

  • Send private message

6

Thursday, April 25th 2013, 2:18pm

20% is for manufactured outside China part, it's not total ASP

It's not ASP 20% up.

odyd12

Administrator

Posts: 1,426

Date of registration: Jan 3rd 2013

Thanks: 187

  • Send private message

7

Thursday, April 25th 2013, 2:21pm

20% is manufactured outside of China at 10% cost increase?

Can some translate this part of the text and post here we can do 100 words.

cfeng

Trainee

Posts: 74

Date of registration: Apr 25th 2013

Thanks: 4

  • Send private message

8

Thursday, April 25th 2013, 2:23pm

20%? Where did that come from? Anyone have a link?

yiandrewli

Beginner

Posts: 3

Date of registration: Apr 7th 2013

  • Send private message

9

Thursday, April 25th 2013, 2:24pm

yes

另一方面,海外制造的组件销售价格高出中国制造价格20%,而成本上涨仅10%,大大提升了公司的盈利能力

On the other hand, price for parts manufactured outside China is 20% higher while cost is 10% higher. This greatly improves company's profitability.

MichaelZhao

Trainee

  • "MichaelZhao" started this thread

Posts: 78

Date of registration: Feb 5th 2013

Thanks: 8

  • Send private message

10

Thursday, April 25th 2013, 2:26pm

idled poly plant

The poly plant is NOT idle. This is what's happening now:

http://huati.weibo.com/k/%E5%90%88%E6%88…=510&order=time

In phase 2 now.

odyd12

Administrator

Posts: 1,426

Date of registration: Jan 3rd 2013

Thanks: 187

  • Send private message

11

Thursday, April 25th 2013, 2:27pm

so price for parts is not ASP? what is it then? clearly price 20%, versus cost of 10%, has the gross margin in between,no?

yiandrewli

Beginner

Posts: 3

Date of registration: Apr 7th 2013

  • Send private message

12

Thursday, April 25th 2013, 2:29pm

it's ASP

module price. So they claim to have 10%=20%-10% more profitable with overseas manufacturing.

odyd12

Administrator

Posts: 1,426

Date of registration: Jan 3rd 2013

Thanks: 187

  • Send private message

13

Thursday, April 25th 2013, 2:35pm

SOL sold modules on average at 0.63, so are we saying they sold outsourced modules at $0.75 in Q1?
I thought I stated that "outsourced modules" have 20% higher price than average. Let's correct this statement. So let's assume they are at 0.55 per watt processing call it 0.61 outsource manufacturing. What did they sell modules in China for, 0.58-0.60? this still means 0.72 at 20%. 15% GM?

pg6solar

Beginner

Posts: 47

Thanks: 1

  • Send private message

14

Thursday, April 25th 2013, 2:39pm

15% GM?
I just took a third mortgage on my house. All in on SOL :)

joshchang

Beginner

Posts: 45

Date of registration: Feb 7th 2013

Thanks: 6

  • Send private message

15

Thursday, April 25th 2013, 2:40pm

so price for parts is not ASP? what is it then? clearly price 20%, versus cost of 10%, has the gross margin in between,no?

I think somebody posted that outsourcing costs SOL same as internal cost (correct me if I am wrong since I don't follow too much SOL's news)? Now it costs 10% higher than domestically produced modules? Anyway, SOL has 500MW overseas OEM capacity according to the article. In a positive gross margin scenario, 20% increase in ASP and 10% increase in COGS means much more than 10% margin expansion.


uchsteve

Trainee

Posts: 28

Date of registration: Jan 15th 2013

Thanks: 2

  • Send private message

16

Thursday, April 25th 2013, 2:46pm

Anyone have any theories as to why ex-china produced components fetch a higher price?

Is it because they would be tariff free ... assuming there are tariffs implemented?

If so, it sounds like market participants are pricing in at least a 20% tariff penalty.

nanofrogfish_spf

Intermediate

Posts: 229

Date of registration: Nov 8th 2012

Thanks: 21

  • Send private message

17

Thursday, April 25th 2013, 5:11pm

Isn't that source the same source that had all that bs about Foxconn building all those factories and solar plants in China, which Foxconn later said was completely untrue?

So you're going to re-allocate your investment dollars based on this one article?...although it doesn't jive at all with the facts we all know? Like explo said, aint happening unless there's some big 1-timer...and the market won't reward you for a 1-timer (went thru that last year with CSIQ).

So roll the dice if you like...I'll stick with my steady and visible revenue and profit approach...and the market certainly has been seeing it that way also, and that's the only vote that really counts. Since earnings day, CSIQ is up about 50%, SOL is down 25%...that's a 75% differential in the outcome of your investing dollars, so the market is trying to tell you something.

When it comes to CSIQ, the market knows what's coming. When it comes to SOL, it's a lot more of a gamble.

DClayton

Beginner

Posts: 6

Date of registration: Apr 10th 2013

  • Send private message

18

Thursday, April 25th 2013, 5:33pm

ne21.com published same information that Sol would be coming out of the winter soon and returning to profit.

odyd12

Administrator

Posts: 1,426

Date of registration: Jan 3rd 2013

Thanks: 187

  • Send private message

19

Thursday, April 25th 2013, 5:47pm

20% increase in ASP and 10% increase in COGS means much more than 10% margin expansion.


Yes , like I said 15% or more of 16%. Q4 processing 0.60, Q1 processing 0.55 plus 10% increase =0.605

ASP average 0.63, China average 0.60, 20% gain 0.12=0.72, 0.72-0.605=0.115 0.115/0.72=15.9%

Is this what modules sell for in Europe now?

In addtion to multiple warnings I cannot see 10% to be enough to cover outsourcing cost.

cfeng

Trainee

Posts: 74

Date of registration: Apr 25th 2013

Thanks: 4

  • Send private message

20

Thursday, April 25th 2013, 7:01pm

All Chinese solars are speculative. At any point during the past 12 months you would have been better off with a U.S. solar company FSLR than any of the Chinese solars. And that includes YGE, TSL, CSIQ, SOL and JASO.
http://chart.finance.yahoo.com/z?s=FSLR&…en-US&region=US

1 user apart from you is browsing this thread:

1 guests

Social bookmarks

New Member

EES Hamburg(Yesterday, 3:30am)

allisonlee(May 3rd 2013, 11:26pm)

shinboy(May 2nd 2013, 9:03am)

outsmart(May 2nd 2013, 4:09am)

Rich7601(Apr 28th 2013, 9:18am)

Statistic

  • Members: 87
  • Threads: 1,138
  • Postings: 7,824 (ø 35.73/day)
  • Greetings to our newest member: EES Hamburg

.