I'm currently crunching the numbers of JASO and there is a lot I like. Can someone tell me what speaks against JASO?
Not transparent with cost structure. Chairman doing arms length deals with other businesses he owns (is he or minority JASO owners benefitting). Looking at balance sheet they seem to have faired well compare to peers. I think this is due to being a middle man service partner. Without carrying own branded products they have been able to navigate the pricing volatility better (now they've ventured into branded modules though, thus competing with their customers).
They signed a deal with Hefei city on Feb 26 2011 to spend 13.5 billion RMB to build 3 GW integrated wafer to module plant there. The project is supposed to be complete Sep 2013 (yeah right). Management hubris warning.
To sum up JASO. Price is decent. Balance sheet is decent. What else are you getting? They don't like to tell you.
I disagree with the service partner theory since their tolling revenue historically has been very low. I would be surprised if the Hefei deal didn't allow for some degree on timeline flexibility based on market evolution. As to the secrecy, I don't regard this necessarily as a sign of underperformance. If I remember correctly the company decided not to disclose cell conversion cost any more at at time when they were cost leaders anyhow.
Here are my working hypothesis for JA:
Pros:
- History of financial discipline
- Lowest leverage and highest liquidity among solar 11
- Very competitive cost structure
- Technology edge vs. peers
- Higher or even highest fraction of high-power products produced (60% vs. YGE 15% and CSIQ < 5%)
- Very strong traction in Japan - very high GM contribution out of Japan
- Very good market penetration in China
Cons:
- Dubious arms length deals by management
- Low Brand awareness in the module space
- Channel conflict through direct competition with with customers
- Highest exposure to US tariff (cells) and possibly higher exposure to EU tariffs than peers
Lack of cost transparency is giving me a hard time, but I'm not posting it as a Con. GOGS in Q3 are way higher than what my modeled cpw x volume would give and I don't think inventory carrying cost is enough to explain the gap. So I will wait for Q4 to hopefully get a better picture.
My model even gives me a slight chance of net profit in Q1 so I'm on the watch out...