Jump to content


Dear Guest,
"SolarPVInvestor Forums" is a subscription based site, devoted to investors with an interest in major public solar companies trading on North American, as well as global exchanges. Discussion themes include all aspects of the industry with current news, technology, financials, and investment theses. 
Modern, well organized platform with many ways to extract information, "SolarPVInvestor Forums" is the most sophisticated community of solar investors in North America. Create account and request 24-hours trial package, to experience full access, it is free. 

for access after registration, send an e-mail to

 

 


Photo

Canadian Solar teams with GCL-Poly to build new 1.2GW solar cell facility

GCL

  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 sunnysky

sunnysky

    the MAGIC

  • Premium Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2,701 posts
  • Joined 14-July 13
  • Holdings:CSIQ, DQ, HSOL, JASO, JKS, TSL

Posted 18 May 2014 - 12:48 AM

http://www.pv-tech.o...gn=newsnow-feed


  • 0

#2 Makan

Makan

    新手上路

  • Premium Members
  • Pip
  • 284 posts
  • Joined 27-May 13
  • Holdings:CSIQ, TSL

Posted 18 May 2014 - 01:38 AM

I am not overly happy about it, as I would prefer if they build new capacity outside China, to become more diversified against tariffs.
  • 0

#3 luckygoose

luckygoose

    实习生

  • Premium Members
  • Pip
  • 293 posts
  • Joined 20-December 12
  • Locationeurope
  • Holdings:CSIQ, JKS

Posted 18 May 2014 - 01:56 AM

They will look at it strategely. For the long it will be best to be in china as this is going to be an incredebly big market and the best low cost place to be. Tariffs is a shorter term problem in the world adoption of solar which is an unreversable situation in my opinion. See the different reports of how many gw we are talking about in a few years from now. There will come a time that panels will be short and this will come sooner than a lot of people think.
  • 0

#4 odyd

odyd

    管理员

  • Administrators
  • 7,348 posts
  • Joined 03-January 13
  • LocationAirdrie, Alberta
  • Holdings:TSL

Posted 18 May 2014 - 05:16 AM

This announcement was made on Friday by the company. The plan to put only 60MW is very slow start to a big venture. They have complained their cell lines were replaced by the purchases of cell from third parties, due to fire. They said the fire was not significant, but it brought the cost across the entire value chain by 1%  This means cells are so expensive that made a 2% difference from stopped production costs to increase overall average.

 

Practical outcome with 3G of modules today and say 1.66GW of cells by the end of the year, there is no way they can improve on the processing cost at 14.7%. Makan, I agree. Why not to build a cell factory in Indonesia as they apparently had a plan for 60MW modules there but have not heard about for some time? Cell production is automation, so it can be build anywhere. They were so happy to take on the US orders in Canada during the conference but prefer buying extra cost Taiwanese cells for that plant, why not build in Canada? To be honest this low 60MW output is probably the caution, leaving the choice open for another location.

Saying 1.2GW but doing 60MW is not a great sign of confidence in my view  for China's capacity and demand.


  • 0

#5 eysteinh

eysteinh

    职业选手

  • Premium Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2,423 posts
  • Joined 09-December 12
  • Holdings:JKS

Posted 18 May 2014 - 06:04 AM

I agree. Cell is all about wet chemical costs, electricity costs and automation. (if you go for automation that is, you can ofcourse do it manually as well - and most of chemical process are batch not automated meaning one wet etch bench - then manually move to the next etc vs inline meaning on a transport conveyor belt or transported with robotic arms etc.)  Labor is not that big part of the cycle. I think Singapore is a good location as well due to also a hub for solar production and thus easy access to raw goods needed.  

But at-least it is a support of China demand. CSIQ would not built here if not. Granted 60 MW is not the biggest of starts. 


  • 0





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: GCL