You are not logged in.

Pop2mollys

Intermediate

  • "Pop2mollys" started this thread

Posts: 229

Date of registration: Jan 15th 2013

Thanks: 15

  • Send private message

1

Tuesday, February 26th 2013, 2:35pm

First Solar losing market share to Chinese 11

First solar losing market share to silicon Chinese solars... Ha ha what's new... Losing market share every Q...

larryvand

Intermediate

Posts: 218

Date of registration: Jan 2nd 2013

Thanks: 6

  • Send private message

2

Tuesday, February 26th 2013, 2:42pm

FSLR getting crashed after hours. $28.10 is so far the low, from a $31.36 regular close (which was down 4% but now down 12% AH).

joshchang

Beginner

Posts: 13

Date of registration: Feb 7th 2013

  • Send private message

3

Tuesday, February 26th 2013, 2:53pm

FSLR $0.66 cost per watt vs. TSL $0.61 cost per watt. FSLR's cost advantage is completely gone now.

joshchang

Beginner

Posts: 13

Date of registration: Feb 7th 2013

  • Send private message

4

Tuesday, February 26th 2013, 2:58pm

projects development & pipeline is still way ahead of chinese competitors. but chinese peers will catch up quickly in this area I believe.

Pop2mollys

Intermediate

  • "Pop2mollys" started this thread

Posts: 229

Date of registration: Jan 15th 2013

Thanks: 15

  • Send private message

5

Tuesday, February 26th 2013, 3:08pm

FSLR $0.66 cost per watt vs. TSL $0.61 cost per watt. FSLR's cost advantage is completely gone now.
Yup and per SOL last CC they expect .57/watt in Q4...

spiritcraft

Intermediate

Posts: 163

Date of registration: Dec 11th 2012

Thanks: 7

  • Send private message

6

Tuesday, February 26th 2013, 3:17pm

projects development & pipeline is still way ahead of chinese competitors. but chinese peers will catch up quickly in this area I believe.


This is the big deal... utility scale PV is going global fast and I don't think any of us dare to imagine it. The old inflection point that was once ten years off is very close indeed. Somehow our companies have to be ready price wise and performance wise or someone else will step in and do these globally. First Solar and SunPower are both way up due to the simple fact that they are utility scale companies with pipelines.

Some think that FSLR may one day morph into a developer using Chi-Solar modules since Si PV offers more wattage per square foot.

Pop2mollys

Intermediate

  • "Pop2mollys" started this thread

Posts: 229

Date of registration: Jan 15th 2013

Thanks: 15

  • Send private message

7

Tuesday, February 26th 2013, 3:24pm

Boy it really sounds like they are waving the white flag to Chinese solars. From there cc it really sounds like they are try to transform themself into a developer instead of a producer. Very good news... Demand is ramping again but they refuse to open closed down factories because they can't compete on a per watt production basis with solar 11. This is very interesting and good news

Klothilde

Intermediate

Posts: 172

Date of registration: Nov 19th 2012

Thanks: 18

  • Send private message

8

Tuesday, February 26th 2013, 3:59pm

FSLR $0.66 cost per watt vs. TSL $0.61 cost per watt. FSLR's cost advantage is completely gone now.


That's apples to oranges. If you look at apples to apples you'll get a different result.

explo

Intermediate

Posts: 515

Date of registration: Sep 29th 2012

Thanks: 22

  • Send private message

9

Tuesday, February 26th 2013, 4:09pm

FSLR $0.66 cost per watt vs. TSL $0.61 cost per watt. FSLR's cost advantage is completely gone now.


That's apples to oranges. If you look at apples to apples you'll get a different result.


Care to share?

Pop2mollys

Intermediate

  • "Pop2mollys" started this thread

Posts: 229

Date of registration: Jan 15th 2013

Thanks: 15

  • Send private message

10

Tuesday, February 26th 2013, 4:13pm

Ummm that's about a direct comparison as you can get ... Just look at the 9 cent gap between fslr and SOL and tell me how they are not in trouble. That gap is only going to extend throughout 2013 too

larryvand

Intermediate

Posts: 218

Date of registration: Jan 2nd 2013

Thanks: 6

  • Send private message

11

Tuesday, February 26th 2013, 5:50pm

All you have to know to figure out that FSLR is in trouble is the fact that they did not want to give guidance for 2013.

eysteinh

Trainee

Posts: 144

Date of registration: Dec 9th 2012

Thanks: 10

  • Send private message

12

Tuesday, February 26th 2013, 6:13pm

First solar has more cost than both rec and trina solar. (Rec 0.65 Trina 0.61 First solar 0.68)
If you add opex costs things get even more interesting. Only strenght of First solar now is low interest on debt, but this is in no way enough to compensate.

Btw, Rec produced a system in q4 at 1euro per watt = 1.3$/watt. First solar according to the conference call has a cost of 0.68 for module and BoS cost of 0.73 for a system cost of attleast 1.41 $/watt.
(http://seekingalpha.com/article/1227281-…anscript?page=4)

If REC can produce system cheaper than First Solar I am pretty sure Trina solar can too. And since system cost was the advantage first solar has claimed so far, this is very dramatic for first solar.

larryvand

Intermediate

Posts: 218

Date of registration: Jan 2nd 2013

Thanks: 6

  • Send private message

13

Tuesday, February 26th 2013, 6:27pm

eysteinh, what does BoS stand for? Thanks.

spiritcraft

Intermediate

Posts: 163

Date of registration: Dec 11th 2012

Thanks: 7

  • Send private message

14

Tuesday, February 26th 2013, 6:35pm

I take a stab at that... Balance of System

1 registered user thanked already.

Users who thanked for this post:

larryvand

eysteinh

Trainee

Posts: 144

Date of registration: Dec 9th 2012

Thanks: 10

  • Send private message

15

Tuesday, February 26th 2013, 7:01pm

Correct. Things like inverters and wire cables.

1 registered user thanked already.

Users who thanked for this post:

larryvand

spiritcraft

Intermediate

Posts: 163

Date of registration: Dec 11th 2012

Thanks: 7

  • Send private message

16

Tuesday, February 26th 2013, 7:30pm

It's usually installation costs also... labor, "soft costs" like permitting, fees, profit etc.

We concentrate so much on trying to figure out who can squeeze a penny or two here and there and often overlook BOS costs. It is really stunning how low BOS costs are in Germany as compared to the US. Germany has a union-like, well paid and experienced workforce and their BOS costs for utility scaly install is like 35% of that in the US. I can't quote the exact figures but have read much about it somewhat recently. Perhaps Boss could help or if ABC is lurking as he was the expert in this area.

Whatever the figure, it is astonishing. Here in the US, if we could get BOS costs under serious control, you could see unsubsidized utility scale development expand into the 10's of GW annually. I do remember that "soft costs" were crazy high here as opposed to Germany. I suspect there is a corporate skimming off the top by the sponsor, developer?

My 20 years in Real Estate development, working on multi-million dollar projects makes me immediately suspect that "soft costs" here may be greatly enhanced by developer fees and profits that actually hinder economic feasibility. (I have seen it all) I can't figure out what else might cause the huge discrepancy as it certainly isn't labor costs. I also don't believe it is land, site acquisition costs... especially if we are talking areas of desert in the SW.

The gist of it is that we seem to forget sometimes that BOS costs in the US in particular are really holding back massive installations since we are now talking about grid parity rather than reliance on subsidies.

That's my rant...

1 registered user thanked already.

Users who thanked for this post:

larryvand

Posts: 47

Date of registration: Feb 4th 2013

Thanks: 2

  • Send private message

17

Yesterday, 12:34am

All you have to know to figure out that FSLR is in trouble is the fact that they did not want to give guidance for 2013.



FSLR just reported blow out number that no other solar even comes close to. They have a matrue proect pipeline to drive margins. Q1 pushing 25% GM is phenominal. Only other of the C11 coming close in the near future is CSIQ and their close is like $1 EPS.

explo

Intermediate

Posts: 515

Date of registration: Sep 29th 2012

Thanks: 22

  • Send private message

18

Yesterday, 1:05am

All you have to know to figure out that FSLR is in trouble is the fact that they did not want to give guidance for 2013.


The fact that they can buy a module with 15% conversion efficiency, saving a lot of BOS cost compared to their own 13%, for 65 cents while having a 68 cent cost to make their own inferior modules, says that their module production is holding back their project profitability.

Modules too bad, sad but true?
Projects too good to be true, over time?

Posts: 110

Date of registration: Nov 8th 2012

Thanks: 8

  • Send private message

19

Yesterday, 4:03am

We concentrate so much on trying to figure out who can squeeze a penny or two here and there and often overlook BOS costs. It is really stunning how low BOS costs are in Germany as compared to the US.
spirit, you hit on a very important topic, that people seem to be simply ignoring...that we're down to pennies on the modules, while there are nickles, dimes and quarters to be saved on the BOS side.

I believe most of the inefficiency happens before construction starts. This includes both design and permitting requirements. In the US, permitting is erratic from state to state, and usually involves multiple agencies with long delays. Many companies have been working more towards cookie-cutter designs and details to help cut down on the design side....for instance, a residential solar comapny can sell kits that come in 5kW increments, but nothing in-between unless you pay a premium...

On the red-tape side, over time this will become more efficient as the industry matures and the process is streamlined...something Germany has a huge head-start over the US. I think you'll find the same dynamic unfold in all new markets...it's just part of the industry's maturation process.

We should really pay more attention to the BOS side, as lowering this will help fuel future growth. I've posted this comment before from an article in REW about module costs, but I think it's worth repeating because it supports this theme;

Shah adds that most developers today are “not looking for price reductions,” citing significantly lowered costs as the primary reason. “The difference between getting a 70 cent a watt module and a 65 cent a watt module is just not that big of a deal anymore for system costs,” Shah said. “People are now looking at non price features for making decision on who to buy from.”

Posts: 47

Date of registration: Feb 4th 2013

Thanks: 2

  • Send private message

20

Yesterday, 8:42am

All you have to know to figure out that FSLR is in trouble is the fact that they did not want to give guidance for 2013.


The fact that they can buy a module with 15% conversion efficiency, saving a lot of BOS cost compared to their own 13%, for 65 cents while having a 68 cent cost to make their own inferior modules, says that their module production is holding back their project profitability.

Modules too bad, sad but true?
Projects too good to be true, over time?


So what you are stating is, they have room to grow margins. :)

Similar threads

Social bookmarks

.

New Member

SummerNbp(Today, 8:24pm)

JulyWebb(Feb 26th 2013, 11:19am)

Icarus(Feb 21st 2013, 2:21pm)

GreenEarth(Feb 19th 2013, 2:43pm)

thejaq(Feb 19th 2013, 5:19am)

Statistic

  • Members: 50
  • Threads: 454
  • Postings: 2,718 (ø 17.76/day)
  • Greetings to our newest member: SummerNbp

.